Political Extortion and Union Busting
Local 372 President Veronica Montgomery-Costa said, “We know that these
profit-minded interests are leaning on legislators, who rely on their
contributions to get elected. The charter schools quota imposed by Race to the
Top coupled with the fund raising squeeze by the hedge fund operators is a form
of political extortion our legislators will find hard to resist.”
Costa added, “At the same time, we have financiers who stand to profit from the
additional charters, forming political action committees funding media campaigns
accusing the unions of depriving our state’s students of $700 million in federal
funds.”
Costa said, “The current trend in charter school models divides city school
districts into two separate and unequal school systems — a contradiction to the
landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka,
Kansas.”
Costa added, “The requirement by the federal government for states to increase
the number of Charter Schools in exchange for federal education funding is an
action that can only lead to the steady erosion and ultimate destruction of what
President Thomas Jefferson envisioned as Public Education in the
“Local 372 has called for a freeze in the proliferation of Charter Schools until
the existing Charters and their for-profit or non-profit managing entities are
properly monitored to determine each schools’ fiscal ethics and transparency.
Each Charter must be evaluated, not only by test scores, but by its successes
and failures in students’ academic and cultural achievement, as well as their
progress in obtaining skills applicable for the workforce,”
Costa insisted.
Charters are a good idea gone bad.
Charter Schools were originally intended by esteemed educators to serve as
alternative programs within existing public school systems which would pilot
innovative strategies and approaches to educating children in all socioeconomic
categories as well as students who are English Language Learners and children
with special needs.
Unionized
Charters get positive results.
The first generation of Charter Schools, the “Conversion Charters,”
retained the model of public school staffing, to include a full range of
pedagogical and non-pedagogical personnel — that included a full complement of
Local 372 student support service workers.
Pedagogical and non-pedagogical Conversion Charter employees were also
permitted to retain their union membership.
The
Renaissance has a student body whose families speak 24 languages other than
English, and serves a high percentage of students that live in poverty.
According to the PTA Co-President, the school-wide ELL percentages are
“misleadingly low, because Renaissance students are turned into English speakers
by the third grade. The
In the subsequent proliferation of Charter Schools the prototype of Charters was
mutated to exclude union membership as an elective employee option, and the
staffing model was altered to permit the exclusion of vital student support
services.
The new charters divide and conquer neighbors and district schools.
As the years have passed under mayoral sole control of
Costa said, “This two-tier divide, separate and not equal, now pits charter
parents against public school parents, prides non-union workers above union
workers and values charter school children over the neighborhood public school
children left behind.”
“This union leader can only conclude that the charter movement, as demonstrated
by the recent maneuvering of our City and Federal government, is more about
union busting and profiteering than it is about providing all children with the
best possible education.”
“State legislators who first refused to cave in to the extortion tactics of the
Race to the Top proposal were not only politically brave but wise, but their
bravery has faded fast,” said Costa.
“The pressure put upon elected officials by hedge fund operators may well be too
great to overcome.”